wow.  fascinating and scary site, Conservapedia is the conservative (get it??) response to wikipedia, which is apparently a liberal, anti-christian, anti-american site.  i had no idea it was so controvertial!  anyway, check out this little snippet – their page on unicorns.


From Conservapedia

The existence of unicorns is controversial. Secular opinion is that they are mythical. However, they are referred to in the Bible nine times,[1] which provides an unimpeachable de facto argument for their once having been in existence.

In the original texts, unicorns go by the Hebrew name Re-em whereas the Greek Septuagint used the name Monokeros.[2] Unicorn itself is Latin. All three names mean “one horn“.

While popularly characterized as a horned member of the horse baramin, it is likely that the unicorn was actually quite unhorselike. One recognized theory is that the unicorn was actually the rhinoceros,[1] however a growing number of Creation researchers are theorizing that the unicorn was actually a member of the ceratopsian baramin.[2]

Post-Noachian references[1] to unicorns have led some researchers to argue that unicorns are still alive today. At the very least, it is likely that they were taken aboard the Ark prior to the Great Flood.

 Totally insane. (the insane comment is back to me)  i cannot believe how out-there some people are.  if you are a crazy right-wing neo-christian conservative that would like to explain to me why that is not insane, please do.  i yearn to know. 


One Response to “conservapedia”

  1. I didn’t realize Christians believed in Unicorns. Where is THAT in the bible???

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: